Reports and credits¶
A report is an AI-assisted, evidence-cited summary of what a particular politician has said about a particular topic across the Hansard speeches we have on record. Every claim in a report links back to a specific speech chunk, so you can verify it in one click.
Reports cost credits, which you buy in packs (or earn by submitting accepted corrections).
Buy credits See your credit balance
In this section¶
- Buying credits — packs, payment, refunds, taxes.
- Generating a report — the flow, the pricing, what to expect.
Why credits, not subscriptions¶
We charge per report, not per month. This means:
- Casual users pay for what they use, with no recurring bill.
- Heavy users pay in proportion to load — running a report has a real compute cost, and we'd rather price it transparently than hide it behind tiered plans.
- There's nothing to cancel — credits don't expire.
What a report contains¶
- A plain-language summary of the politician's stated positions on the topic, derived from the speeches we found.
- Direct quotes, with each quote linking back to the originating speech.
- Tensions or contradictions if the speeches disagree with each other over time, with the dates so you can see the shift.
- A footer of every speech consulted, with date and link.
What a report does not contain:
- The model's opinions about the politician.
- Speculation about why a politician holds a position.
- Claims that aren't grounded in something the politician actually said in Hansard.
Limits¶
- One report runs at a time per account (queued; you'll get an email when each is ready).
- Free-tier accounts have a soft cap on reports per day to keep abuse costs predictable. The cap is generous; if you hit it for legitimate research, ask for an increase from your account page.
- Reports are stored on your account and visible only to you. They are not indexed by the public site.
What if a report is wrong¶
If a report misrepresents what a politician said:
- Tell us — there's a feedback link on every report.
- You may be eligible for a refund if the issue is a bug on our side (e.g. wrong politician's speeches got included). Refunds add credits back to your balance.
- We treat report-quality complaints as a learning signal — if a class of question consistently produces bad reports, we adjust the prompt or the retrieval logic.
We won't refund a report just because the conclusion isn't what you wanted. Reports describe what the politician has said; that's not the same as what you wish they'd said.